Closed madflojo closed 2 weeks ago
It's interesting. I'm not sure how to handle precedence though. Should the user guide take priority over the repo style guide? Should we just say "here's a user style guide" and let the guide itself describe how it should reconcile with the repo? I'd like to avoid a flag that determines precedence as the goal is laziness and I want a magical low-config experience. I don't want users pondering flags as they type aicommit
in their terminal.
In your particular case, I'm not sure the model would do a good job of adding pop culture references or "wit". In general LLMs are bad at humor and subtlety, great at dry technical writing. I wonder if you add the the -c "use occasional humor and pop culture references"
to some commits if it will create acceptable messages.
I think repository always takes precedence with individual preferences being in addition when not conflicting with repository rules.
I bet this can be done with a prompt but will likely get mixed results.
Also,
While I think individual preferences are nice, I'm super lazy and the thought of dropping a commits.md in every repository I ever touch sounds like too much if I'm the only person using it.
So I think looking in the users home directory if a repository one is not found is also a nice feature.
In addition to the repository-level rules, what do y'all think about user-global-level set of rules that enhances (or overrides with a flag) the repository-level rules?
I sometimes like to include a bit of humor or pop culture references in my commit messages. It's my little personal touch. But it's not for everyone.