Closed dsseng closed 6 months ago
I believe the Dockerfile is MIT as well thus fine to modify as long as I keep the copy of the license along with it
Yup :+1:
Yes, I'd be happy to upstream my Dockerfile for Fedora-based code-server if developers approve this. Maybe I could do openSUSE Tumbleweed as well as I use it often as well.
Please feel free, this sounds good to me.
Here's the latest version before I added more abstractions accomodating CLI editors and splitting base out: https://github.com/dsseng/fedora-development-containers/blob/baff02555eec68f70ec55a19867a859029e2a525/Dockerfile.code-server
This is quite a close reimplementation of the original Dockerfile. It uses GitHub releases and raw repo data to fetch rpm and container entrypoint respectively.
I'll submit a PR once this is considered decent option (also need to add CI stuff to generate those images). Also will try to do openSUSE Tumbleweed based one.
That looks great!
What is your suggestion?
Build more Docker/OCI images using various distributions.
Why do you want this feature?
Some peoples' workflows are accustomed to a certain distro, personally I like using Fedora for development. It provides more cutting edge build-dependencies and is preferred for me.
Are there any workarounds to get this functionality today?
I just build images myself using modified version of code-server Dockerfile also installing wanted extra dependencies. I believe the Dockerfile is MIT as well thus fine to modify as long as I keep the copy of the license along with it, sorry if I'm wrong.
Are you interested in submitting a PR for this?
Yes, I'd be happy to upstream my Dockerfile for Fedora-based code-server if developers approve this. Maybe I could do openSUSE Tumbleweed as well as I use it often as well.