Closed rkdarst closed 1 month ago
Converted list to check-boxes so that it becomes easier to see what is not done yet.
Closing. These are good thoughts but the material has moved on quite a bit since in the last 2-3 iterations and many of the good comments above are either in or not relevant anymore since we don't focus here on CR certification or CR teaching per se.
My unsorted thoughts on 2020.june training (some of these will be split to other issues):
[ ] we should have attending a CR as a prereq, if you want to teach CR
[ ] progression: attend CR -> helper training -> (be a helper) -> instructor training
[ ] do we teach tech stuff? I don't think so, people need to learn that themselves by doing (possibly by being an instructor and figuringo ut it that way)
[ ] do we teach people to be an instructor? not everything, we lay groundwork but I think we can only really teach that by having them do it, and provide mentoring. like we all should be doing to ourselves
[ ] is SWC training a prerequisite? of course it's good, I don't think there is so much need to duplicate: if they haven't, have them read the right book's sections
[ ] if someone is SWC instructor-trained, I don't think we need to do much: have them go to a CR workshop, learn material some themselves, then do
[ ] I could see benefit of networking and mechanics of joining, being hub, etc.
[ ] I could see benefits of teaching incidental teachers how to make good lessons (as I've been saying a lot already)
[x] I think today's sessions were good.
[x] the example of teaching was a good development, I think. for backwards design, I think that an example would have been good.
[ ] For teaching today, we could have recommended more complex things to teach. presenting from slides doesn't give a good example of CR-style teaching. we could recommend in first case, something that uses a shell (even if not CR lesson), and then if not that, some sort of demo. Teaching demo with slides is last option
[ ] direct contact with participants could have let us get more early feedback on what they wanted