Closed joshsmith closed 8 years ago
It might be useful to check them off at the end of a sprint. That way, we have an overview of what's done. Just an idea.
Yeah I agree. When a task disappears for a sprint I think it's no good to hide it since it's out of sight and out of mind.
Just to play devil's advocate here, everything seems much more cluttered when completed tasks aren't marked as completed.
If we want an overview of what's done, you can look at the following:
What if it they were completed at the end of the day?
A task that's merged
is no longer actionable except by marking it complete. I'm fine with user stories staying unchecked since that's a good high-level overview, but we're going to have a lot of detritus in there if we don't check off the broken down tasks.
Ok I'm fine with it. Let us see if there's an issue with it and revisit if checking off becomes a problem.
Completed by whom at the end of whose day? If we're async and spread across timezones, that seems problematic.
Nvm about that comment. I'm on board with just checking off right away.
I guess then the question is really: what benefit does the merged
label have if we're checking it off immediately?
The process right now indicates that something can have its label changed to
merged
. But when does the task get checked off? Who checks it off?