Closed rheinwein closed 8 years ago
Why don't we delete the Dockerfile
and the service/steps for example 17 completely? To test that the caching works on Codeship? Wouldn't the other examples in this repo do that already?
@mlocher Yeah, we could do that instead. Since this is customer-facing and intended for use with the local CLI, I didn't want to add caching to any other step because remote caching isn't supported with local builds, and thought it could potentially be confusing. What we can do instead is take all caching out of here and move it into a different project, maybe merrygoround
instead.
@rheinwein I agree, adding it to merrygoround
or a similar test project is probably a good idea. :shipit:
Since local caching is deprecated, we should remove the tutorial assets and explain where to find more documentation about caching on remote builds.