Closed chanwental closed 4 years ago
Hi, Wentao
Regarding with your first answer, I've looked at the initial code and I found the accurate answer.
In the initial SYNDOF, the sigma was computed as:
sigma = (max_coc - 1) / 2. with initial max_coc = 15.
But after generation of SYNDOF, we found out that the largest blur size was acutally around 28~30. So, we phisically analyze the blur kernel, and found out;
sigma = (max_coc - 1) / 4
was acuatlly making a blur kernel to have the diameter similar to max_coc.
However, instead of regenerating SYNDOF and retrain DMENet (as we ran out of time for CVPR2019), we wrote "sigma = (max_coc) / 4" in the paper, and defined our max_coc = 28. Then, we reflected the equation and refined the SYNDOF generation code for the final release, in which sigma is defined as sigma = (max_coc - 1) / 4.
Please not that that doesn't make any difference in SYNDOF generation process. With that said, if random seeds are the same, initial_SYNDOF(max_coc=15) generates the same images as the refined_SYNDOF(max_coc = 29).
I hope these answer solves your question.
Best, Junyong
Hi, I read a blur_map in your dataset as follows: image = (np.float32(cv2.imread(file_name, cv2.IMREAD_UNCHANGED))/10.)[:, :, 1]. Then the maximum of image is 15. #15=(61-1)/4 It implys max_coc=61, which is not consistent with 28 in your paper. What is the problem?