Don't automatically fix "requeried"

[stinos]

It's the past tense of requery, which might be used especially in source code.

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

On the other hand, requery is missing from all usual dictionaries:

• Oxford Learner's Dicrionary
• Cambridge
• Collins
• Merriam-Webster
• Chambers
• The American Heritage

I'll leave it to others, I am not a native speaker. Either requery should be written re-query, or we should not be so strict and move requeried->required to the code dictionary (and add requeries->requires there).

[DimitriPapadopoulos]

Perhaps we could change to:

requeried->re-queried, required,

[stinos]

On the other hand, requery is missing from all usual dictionaries:

Fairly new to codespell, so now I'm wondering: is this the standard rule, that a word should appear in a semi-official dictionary? Because none of those contain all possible (and valid according to common rules as far as I'm aware) word combinations, whereas especially in code it's common to make such combinations.