Closed polluks closed 4 months ago
Yes, the difficulty is that I cannot find that word in most mainstream curated dictionaries, either as parsable or as parseable:
However, OED does have it, as parsable only:
I usually suggest we follow SCOWL (And Friends), as the mainstream open source spelling database, but unfortunately it lacks both parsable and parseable: http://app.aspell.net/lookup?dict=en_US-large;words=unparsable http://app.aspell.net/lookup?dict=en_US-large;words=unparseable On the other hand, it has both writable and writeable.
The commercial spellchecker I have tried does suggest to replace parseable with parseable.
Searching parsable vs parseable comes up with pages mostly (but not always) suggesting to use parsable instead of parseable, for example:
Grammar books suggest that the final silent e of the root word is dropped, except if the root word ends in ce or ge. That usually remains a suggestion, but I feel parsable should be preferred in formal usage.
The Google Ngram Viewer shows parsable remains more common than parseable, but the difference is not significant enough to rule out parseable: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=unparsable%2Cunparseable&year_start=1800
In any case, if we are to remove this entry, we should review other occurrences of -eable for consistency:
$ grep 'eable->' codespell_lib/data/dictionary.txt | wc -l
87
$
By the way, this entry suggests that writeable is the British spelling while writable is the American spelling:
$ grep 'eable->' codespell_lib/data/dictionary_en-GB_to_en-US.txt
writeable->writable
$
Total nonsense: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=writable%2Cwriteable&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=en-GB-2019 https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=writable%2Cwriteable&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=en-US-2019
See https://github.com/DimitriPapadopoulos/codespell/commit/5f792d8b37781f75645a70115a9d21f2ce70cb7d.
Time permitting, I would like to review and search in SCOWL the 89 -eable entries found in codespell dictionaries. If SCOWL usually accepts both variants, I am happy to discard all such entries. Help welcome!
Please take a look https://english.stackexchange.com/a/623194/273648
Do you suggest we keep the dictionary as is?
The above is a good summary of what I have been documenting previously. However, many native speakers don't like or do not blindly follow grammar rules: they insist on allowing alternative spellings, even when targeting a wider international public.
ok
https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell/blob/3760e619e2a7b7fa8467debb2889d21a34651853/codespell_lib/data/dictionary.txt#L58550 Wiktionary says since 2008 https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unparseable