Closed ggorlen closed 2 years ago
I will be more than happy to provide any feedback, just let me know when you'd want me to stop :) Please also mind that I am not familiar with this many languages as some other users, and that I live in another timezone so it can take some time until I get to review a freshly published PR. As for other users, you can use language rank leaderboards to get idea who's proficient with what language. Unnamed is always a safe bet, this guy was born and raised in a programming equivalent of the Tower of Babel.
Leaderboard for R: https://www.codewars.com/api/v1/leaders/ranks/r
(I haven't added UI because it's inaccurate due to a known issue preventing contributors from getting rank scores after contributing, but it's usable.)
Maybe it would be useful to have a link to the framework docs (https://testthat.r-lib.org/) so users could explore further if necessary? And a version number of the testing framework as well? Or you think it's not necessary, or an additional maintenance problem?
Maybe it would be useful to have a link to the framework docs (https://testthat.r-lib.org/) so users could explore further if necessary? And a version number of the testing framework as well? Or you think it's not necessary, or an additional maintenance problem?
I'm flexible--the link is a nice gesture and might save users a search, but if we do decide to include it, we'd want to be consistent and apply to all testing libraries. It's a bit more maintenance, and I'm not sure the benefit is huge.
https://docs.codewars.com/languages/r has a basic setup already (minus context
) and a link to their GitHub repo. (I'm not sure if any R kata are using preloaded code, but I want to change the preloaded file to preloaded.R
to be more consistent.)
Maybe we should just remove stub pages until we have something.
We can also move that section to this page. I guess that's better.
We can also move that section to this page. I guess that's better.
I think so, so it's consistent with languages that have multiple test libraries.
@hobovsky Let me know if you'd prefer not to be requested for reviews for this sort of PR, and/or if there's another user that might be interested in hopping in. Happy to have your input though!