Closed fschuetz closed 1 year ago
I'm pretty sure you're right, thanks. I'll take a look at it when I dive into another bug I've got open. I'm just buried with work just this second.
No worries. I have a mirror on gitlab where I changed it (also the other issue). If its easier to pull from there I can make it public. Just let me know.
You know, I've been kind of looking for contributors for this project if you're interested. It's just a lot to take on by myself, and I get concerned that I might get hit by a bus or something and then the project is in limbo. You seem like you've already done some spelunking through my codebase. I don't want to rope you into something here, so no obligation, but the offer is out there.
Fixed in 1.3.5
You know, I've been kind of looking for contributors for this project if you're interested. It's just a lot to take on by myself, and I get concerned that I might get hit by a bus or something and then the project is in limbo. You seem like you've already done some spelunking through my codebase. I don't want to rope you into something here, so no obligation, but the offer is out there.
Thanks for the offer and the trust. I am currently quite busy myself and I promised some contributions to other projects. However, I am also very actively using your gfx at the moment as it perfectly fits my needs. When I discover things along the way (developing currently a menu module that allow easily creating text based old school menus). I don't think I can reliably spend the time to help maintaining it, but I am happy to contribute if I see things I along using gfx. Just let me know which way this is most convenient for you.
By all means keep posting issues and suggestions here then. I appreciate all the help. If there's something it can do better let me know.
In gfx_draw_helpers.hpp:175ff, the suspender returns gfx_result::success for the functions suspend, resume, suspend_async and resume_async. Shouldn't it return gfx_result::not_supported if the destination does not have the suspend capability (as it is the case in this template due to the other templates covering all the Suspend == true patterns)?
As the case where suspend is supported is covered by the templates after line 188, implementation for lines 175ff could be: