Closed hamidb80 closed 10 months ago
Thanks for the suggestion @hamidb80! I'm not sure whether the .!
would be useful for most cases. You can already use (!s).len
, and chaining it like you would with .?
(a.?b.?c
) is not necessary, because you already remove the optional at the first step.
like
!
operator when you confident about the presence of the value: