Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Hi there,
The problem here is that there is no company.
This is Open Source Software, created by private individuals!
It seems very strange to have a missing company name failing such a test.
Cheers,
James
Original comment by jamesdriscoll71
on 18 Sep 2014 at 12:43
I would say that the general consensus is that it is indeed a strange
requirement. See for instance this similiar issue for the fluent validation
library.
fluentvalidation.codeplex.com/workitem/7184
But I use other third party open source libraries that specify company name and
while not legally true you could interpret "company name" as "responsible
organization". I would guess that the test requirement stems from the need to
separate the code that is under test, the binaries with our company name, from
the third party binaries. As I said you don't fail the test based on this
missing info but you need to do additional work attaching a disclaimer that
this and that dll is third party.
Original comment by TrimM...@gmail.com
on 23 Sep 2014 at 9:47
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
TrimM...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2014 at 12:29