Support default sort parameters for WFS 1.1.0 sources.

glenhein commented 1 year ago

What does this PR do?

Will add a response property listing the sort property name if it was removed as being unsupported.

Who is reviewing it?

@derekwilhelm @jlcsmith

How should this be tested?

Configure a WFS source that does not support RELEVANCE. Leave the default sort property and default sort order blank in the config. Confirm that a search that sorts by RELEVANCE returns unsorted results. Change the config to use "name" and "ASCENDING" for the default property and order. Confirm that a search that sorts by RELEVANCE returns results sorted by name.

Any background context you want to provide?

What are the relevant tickets?

Fixes: #____

Screenshots

Checklist:

[ ] Documentation Updated
[ ] Update / Add Threat Dragon models
[ ] Update / Add Unit Tests
[ ] Update / Add Integration Tests

Notes on Review Process

Please see Notes on Review Process for further guidance on requirements for merging and abbreviated reviews.

Review Comment Legend:

✏️ (Pencil) This comment is a nitpick or style suggestion, no action required for approval. This comment should provide a suggestion either as an in line code snippet or a gist.
❓ (Question Mark) This comment is to gain a clearer understanding of design or code choices, clarification is required but action may not be necessary for approval.
❗ (Exclamation Mark) This comment is critical and requires clarification or action before approval.

cxddfbot commented 1 year ago

Internal build has been started, your results will be available at build completion.

cxddfbot commented 1 year ago

Build SUCCESS See the job results in legacy Jenkins UI or in Blue Ocean UI.

stale[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs within 7 days. Thank you for your contributions.

codice / ddf