Open AMDmi3 opened 2 years ago
Maybe we should make a clean break at 3.0 and adopt semantic versioning from then on.
If yes, the only question is what features (if any) we would want to finish up before declaring a 3.0.
Well, at least for dpkg 2.6.1um > 2.6um
. But nevertheless, I agree that we should get rid of the um
suffix now that it has been made clear that this and DSDA-Doom are considered the official continuations of original PrBoom+.
If yes, the only question is what features (if any) we would want to finish up before declaring a 3.0.
The only two features that come to mind are MBF21 (but it has already been mentioned that it will not be implemented, so ok) and a Quake-style console. These are just ideas :)
Please use more standard versioning scheme, e.g. please drop the
um
suffix which cannot be handled correctly by most version comparison algorithms (and thus package managers, automated new release reporters, security audit tools etc.). For instance, latest versions of prboom-plus are going backwards:2.6.1um
<2.6um
because2.6
<2.6um
, because alphabetic suffixes mean newer releases (as in openssl1.1.1
<1.1.1a
< ... <1.1.1l
).