Closed fwfichtner closed 1 year ago
@fwfichtner yeah there was a change on the web-optimized part (especially when used in combination with the GDAL COG Driver). This was made to allow more TMS (because with GDAL we were limited to few ones and TMS 1.0 spec)
ref: https://github.com/cogeotiff/rio-cogeo/pull/261
The real question is to know which version give a more precise result
as you noted this case is mentioned in the breaking change in https://github.com/cogeotiff/rio-cogeo/blob/main/CHANGES.md#400-2023-05-31 but we could do a better job explaining what breaks 😓
Got it, thanks! I am still not sure how it broke, but it does make more sense how it is now.
Since the update from
3.5.1
to4.0.1
we are observing an irregular location shift/zoom after translating files to Cloud Optimized GeoTiff. If we change nothing, but therio-cogeo
andmorecantile
(3.4.0
->4.3.0
) version, the results are completely different.The results are completely different (besides the tags I would not have expected any changes):
There are breaking changes in
morecantile
, but it is currently unclear to me how to adapt our code in order to reflect them.Edit: Just after writing this I realized that this is connected to the
web_optimized
-flag.