Closed brixen closed 10 years ago
Hi Brian, thanks for looking at transit-ruby so soon.
But, we have a policy on pull requests, https://github.com/cognitect/transit-ruby#contributing . Also, nobody have thought of Rubinius while developing the gem (sorry!). Before adding Rubinius to the list, we should discuss about the supported Rubies among transit-ruby devs (Cognitect internally). For now, I'd suggest you to join transit-format google group, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/transit-format , and post there the topic of Rubinius support.
One more about CI. At this moment, it's not clear what CI will be used for transit-ruby. Once CI server is chosen, I (or other transit-ruby devs) will add a setup script.
Hi @brixen Just let you know. We had the wiki page, https://github.com/cognitect/transit-format/wiki/Community-Implementations , and Rubinius is there. Probably, Cognitect won't support Rubinius officially (won't test transit on Rubinius), but would maintain the list.
@yokolet thank you for letting me know! What would we need to do to get Rubinius officially tested?
I ran the specs with Rubinius 2.2.10 and all passed as seen below.
Is there any interest in testing on Travis CI? If yes, I can send a PR to enable that as well.
Thanks!