Closed tdg5 closed 7 years ago
Hi there,
we would really like to use transit as well and this is unfortunately preventing uns from using it.
I'll try to take a look at this on Friday.
Bumping because we needed to fork to deal with this, but I would have preferred not to.
I've got this addressed on a branch but I have to do some more testing across Ruby versions (specifically JRuby versions) before releasing. Probably won't get to that before this coming Friday, but it's in progress.
Fixed in 99795d3 Released in transit-ruby-0.8.602
Hello!
I was just wondering if it might be possible to loosen the dependency on
addressable
? Currently, the requirement is~> 2.3.6
, and I was hoping that it might be possible to loosen the requirement by dropping the patch portion of the version so the new requirement would be~> 2.3
.The more strict requirement is giving me dependency trouble given the popularity of the
addressable
library. I tried reducing the restriction and ran the specs on MRI 2.3.0 and didn't have any problems.Alternatively, if you want to bump the dependency to
~> 2.5.0
, that'd help my problem in the near term, but I may be back again to bug you later.I created a branch here with the change if it happens to interest you: https://github.com/tdg5/transit-ruby/tree/loosen-addressable-requirement
Here's the specific diff: https://github.com/tdg5/transit-ruby/commit/f6ec54ffdcae9039bb6a4d3d5721dbeb6f29a76e
If I can answer any questions or offer any other assistance, please let me know. Thanks!