Closed bhaibel closed 6 years ago
@bhaibel - maybe-blocking - are we supposed to be checking in the coverage
folder? It doesn't look like it's checked in in the coveralls-ruby repo; which I assume is the canonical setup: https://github.com/lemurheavy/coveralls-ruby
But I haven't used coveralls before so I don't really know.
coveralls
hooks into Travis automagically and therefore shouldn't need to have a checked-in coverage
directory -- I think the gem is forwarding a coverage report that's generated as a build artifact on CI runs?
Gonna hold off on merging until you ack this so that you can figure out if you're okay with that approach.
Changes Unknown when pulling afe6dc91d2e1927afc5c5b275a6c1cfcbf778269 on bh-add-coveralls-support into on primary.