As a Coherence developer, when an application request a NamedCache from a CoherenceCluster (which then in turn acquires a NamedCache from a CoherenceClusterMember), should the CoherenceClusterMember supplying the NamedCache be lost/destroyed/close for any reason, the NamedCache becomes unusable. Ideally it should "fail over" to another CoherenceClusterMember provided by the CoherenceCluster.
As a Coherence developer, when an application request a NamedCache from a CoherenceCluster (which then in turn acquires a NamedCache from a CoherenceClusterMember), should the CoherenceClusterMember supplying the NamedCache be lost/destroyed/close for any reason, the NamedCache becomes unusable. Ideally it should "fail over" to another CoherenceClusterMember provided by the CoherenceCluster.