Open svigerske opened 5 years ago
Comment by hpwalton created at 2006-07-22 02:58:42
Changing assignee from somebody to hpwalton.
Comment by thh created at 2006-07-26 09:40:22
I have to look closer at Cgl to confirm, but I could imagine that after separating model and solver this can be relatively easily done using existing Flopc++ and COIN features. If so this should be the first approach - to write an example where this is done, then it would be possible to judge if this elegant enough or if a Flopc++ extention is needed.
Issue created by migration from Trac.
Original creator: hpwalton
Original creation time: 2006-07-22 02:57:47
Assignee: somebody
Version:
Motivation: It can sometimes be very useful to add many constraints into a cut set in order to tighten an LP relaxation (for example). However, it can be a rather large set which may slow the LP down significantly if added a priori. Binding these as needed can significantly speed up solving LPs.
Proposal: Allow normal FlopC++ specification of the constraint, but mark it (attribute on the constraint?) as a cut set. At runtime, instead of instantiating this to the normal constraint block, add them to appropriate Cgl structures. In turn, the Cgl structures will be added to the OsiSolverInterface.