Open kibaekkim opened 4 years ago
No, use master.
We have been a bit remiss in documenting contributions since the move to Github. For a substantial contribution like this, we should get some paperwork. Ideally, I would like to gave some kind of automated system for signing CLAs, e.g., this bot. Maybe we could use this as a test case.
Sure, automating the process for contributions to existing projects that just need CSROs would be great.
On Thu, 2020-05-28 at 08:47 -0700, Ted Ralphs wrote:
We have been a bit remiss in documenting contributions since the move to Github. For a substantial contribution like this, we should get some paperwork. Ideally, I would like to gave some kind of automated system for signing CLAs, e.g., this bot. Maybe we could use this as a test case.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. -- Matthew Saltzman School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences Clemson University mjs AT clemson DOT edu
I have implemented and maintained the interfaces to OOQP and SCIP. The interfaces may be incomplete but working fine for my own purpose. It must be better if the interfaces would be ported to and maintained in this repo. I can make a PR for that. Hopefully, review process can resolve any incomplete parts.
My question is: which branch should I use as a parent branch to make the PR?
I see that OSI is being refactorized now, which looks like a departure from the current stable version. Would it be OK to make the PR from
stable/0.108
?