Open tillea opened 1 year ago
This issue for all other architectures than i386 was obviously solved in version 0.1.14. Unfortunately problems for i386 only are remaining which has the following failures:
══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:72'): ModularityVertexPartition membership and quality ──
isTRUE(all.equal(t02_v01, t02_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
`actual`: FALSE
`expected`: TRUE
── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:90'): RBERVertexPartition membership and quality ──
isTRUE(all.equal(t03_v01, t03_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
`actual`: FALSE
`expected`: TRUE
── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:126'): SurpriseVertexPartition membership and quality ──
isTRUE(all.equal(t05_v01, t05_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
`actual`: FALSE
`expected`: TRUE
── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:148'): resolution_parameter parameter ───────────
isTRUE(all.equal(t06_v01, t06_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
`actual`: FALSE
`expected`: TRUE
── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:166'): num_iter parameter ───────────────────────
isTRUE(all.equal(t07_v01, t07_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
`actual`: FALSE
`expected`: TRUE
── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:189'): initial_membership parameter ─────────────
isTRUE(all.equal(t08_v01, t08_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
`actual`: FALSE
`expected`: TRUE
── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:212'): edge_weights parameter ───────────────────
isTRUE(all.equal(t09_v01, t09_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
`actual`: FALSE
`expected`: TRUE
── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:235'): node_sizes parameter ─────────────────────
isTRUE(all.equal(t10_v01, t10_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
`actual`: FALSE
`expected`: TRUE
[ FAIL 8 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 20 ]
Error: Test failures
I admit I have no idea how to cope with this. Kind regards, Andreas.
Hi Andreas,
I appreciate the feedback.
I don't have an i386 machine that I can use for testing. Does Debian use an i386 machine? Or is there an emulator? If so can you point it out to me?
I appreciate your consideration and guidance.
Thank you.
Ever grateful, Brent
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:09 AM Andreas Tille @.***> wrote:
This issue for all other architectures than i386 was obviously solved in version 0.1.14. Unfortunately problems for i386 only https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/r/r-cran-leidenbase/29511408/log.gz__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!nGIF7Br6ujGv7RetKibjUlGqwxd3iuyi4HASKR3-5gJAOZ4ua4NrCgWWlWcytGxWWI3JrYFoeuRiKwNmJt6X$ are remaining which has the following failures:
══ Failed tests ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ ── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:72'): ModularityVertexPartition membership and quality ── isTRUE(all.equal(t02_v01, t02_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
actual
: FALSEexpected
: TRUE ── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:90'): RBERVertexPartition membership and quality ── isTRUE(all.equal(t03_v01, t03_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
actual
: FALSEexpected
: TRUE ── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:126'): SurpriseVertexPartition membership and quality ── isTRUE(all.equal(t05_v01, t05_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
actual
: FALSEexpected
: TRUE ── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:148'): resolution_parameter parameter ─────────── isTRUE(all.equal(t06_v01, t06_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
actual
: FALSEexpected
: TRUE ── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:166'): num_iter parameter ─────────────────────── isTRUE(all.equal(t07_v01, t07_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
actual
: FALSEexpected
: TRUE ── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:189'): initial_membership parameter ───────────── isTRUE(all.equal(t08_v01, t08_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
actual
: FALSEexpected
: TRUE ── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:212'): edge_weights parameter ─────────────────── isTRUE(all.equal(t09_v01, t09_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
actual
: FALSEexpected
: TRUE ── Failure ('test-leidenbase.R:235'): node_sizes parameter ───────────────────── isTRUE(all.equal(t10_v01, t10_v01_expect)) is not TRUE
actual
: FALSEexpected
: TRUE[ FAIL 8 | WARN 0 | SKIP 0 | PASS 20 ] Error: Test failures
I admit I have no idea how to cope with this. Kind regards, Andreas.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/cole-trapnell-lab/leidenbase/issues/36*issuecomment-1378586486__;Iw!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!nGIF7Br6ujGv7RetKibjUlGqwxd3iuyi4HASKR3-5gJAOZ4ua4NrCgWWlWcytGxWWI3JrYFoeuRiK7fCQM8t$, or unsubscribe https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACXSPQZWXKAUTSJQWKGEQHLWR2IFZANCNFSM6AAAAAARDK75U4__;!!K-Hz7m0Vt54!nGIF7Br6ujGv7RetKibjUlGqwxd3iuyi4HASKR3-5gJAOZ4ua4NrCgWWlWcytGxWWI3JrYFoeuRiK2cwlyYj$ . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hi Brent,
Am Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 04:00:18PM -0800 schrieb brgew:
I appreciate the feedback.
You are welcome.
I don't have an i386 machine that I can use for testing. Does Debian use an i386 machine? Or is there an emulator? If so can you point it out to me?
Debian has autobuilders for quite a lot of architectures. I personally was able to reproduce the issue even with an i386 chroot.
Luckily a Debian developer found a working solution:
https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-cran-leidenbase/-/blob/master/debian/patches/fix-i386.patch
Hope this helps, Andreas.
Hi, the Debian packaged version of leidenbase has to pass its test on different architectures. This works well for amd64 and others. However, for some architectures there is a failure. You might like to look at the full log of the CI test for arm64. It contains this snippet which seems to be relevant:
This error occurs for the architectures arm64, i386, ppc64el and s390x. For i386 there are even more errors ( here you can find the log ) but may be I should open a different issue once the issue above is fixed. Kind regards, Andreas.