Closed Daveyr closed 3 years ago
I second this.
PR that implements this is up! Please give it a try and LMK if any issues! https://github.com/colearendt/tidyjson/pull/132
Thank you for your lightning response!
Just a question: in your PR you use rlang::quo
, should it not be rlang::enquo
?
Suggestion: perhaps add a test too with the embrace operator (as opposed to having only the !!!
operator).
I thought I did add a test with the embrace operator?
Also, I think quos vs. enquos is the choice, and I don’t think enquos is needed (isn’t it for names?). I have to admit that I often forget the distinctions haha - you might be right. I’ll take a look later!
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 2, 2021, at 11:10 AM, Ramiro Magno notifications@github.com wrote:
Thank you for your lightning response!
Just a question: in your PR you use rlang::quo, should it not be rlang::enquo?
Suggestion: perhaps add a test too with the embrace operator (as opposed to having only the !!! operator).
— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/colearendt/tidyjson/issues/129#issuecomment-753491537, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFQBVVSXUF2JTYFVQ3AMCFDSX5ARFANCNFSM4PDR7GWA.
With dplyr verbs it is possible to redirect environment variables as data variables, for instance:
It would be very helpful if tidyjson verbs could do the same, e.g.