Open Tonylac77 opened 1 year ago
Any update? Have you managed to get the answer for this?
The --library
setting is meant for retrospective evaluations and comparison of different settings and scoring functions.
In the README, we mention how to use the docking
objective functions. An example of a configuration file is here.
If there is a different callable evaluation, you can use the DockingObjective
class as a reference. It might take some tweaking to get this right, but it should be doable!
Hi @connorcoley Thanks for the prompt reply :)
Hopefully that promptness makes up for missing @Tonylac77 's original comment for over a year! (sorry)
First of all, I would like to thank you for your work with MolPal, I'm sure this will be very useful to the drug discovery community in the future.
I am trying to use your software to predict docking scores that have been generated by my own consensus docking pipeline .
I am struggling to understand (despite your very clear documentation) how I would go about this. If I understand correctly I would be using the lookup function of Molpal. However, when I look at your examples on GitHub (for example in /examples/objective/EnamineHTS_lookup.ini which points to /data/EnamineHTS_scores.csv.gz) it seems the software is looking at the entire libraries docking scores. Obviously, I am understanding something wrong here as the point is to have to dock only a small part of the library.
These are the two ways I understand this, feel free to let me know if I'm completely off with either of these...
I apologize if I am missing something obvious.
Thank you for your time and assistance.