I last checked this a few months ago, not sure if it still exists.
the Tree#select method uses digits to describe paths, and fails if a node has more than 10 children (i.e. 0-9 are all used up). There is at least a partial implementation that circumvents this issue, but it is not the default and may have slower runtime.
Original report by JONAS GROSCHWITZ (Bitbucket: jgroschwitz, GitHub: jgroschwitz).
I last checked this a few months ago, not sure if it still exists.
the Tree#select method uses digits to describe paths, and fails if a node has more than 10 children (i.e. 0-9 are all used up). There is at least a partial implementation that circumvents this issue, but it is not the default and may have slower runtime.