License clarification

[jplouis]

The setup.py lists the licens as GPL, but also has a classifier for BSD. The readme.rst references BSD-ish and the docs directory has a BSD like license.txt and a GPL file. Is the intent to publish the library under BSD, GPL or dual licensed?

Thanks

[djay]

Which would prefer? I suspect all plone plugins have to GPL anyway...

[jplouis]

We don't use Plone but were going to try and use the plugin with Zope. We would prefer BSD, many projects under github.com/collective are licensed with BSD.

Thanks

[khink]

I see no problem with using a permissive (BSD) license. I assume other contributors won't object, so unless i hear from @djay @macagua @kcleong @puittenbroek @maartenkling @pysailor @ovidiumiron @ltakens or @zopyx, lets's accept a pull request that makes the product BSD-licensed.

[zopyx]

Do what you want..

[djay]

Fine by me

On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, 10:47 AM Andreas Jung notifications@github.com wrote:

Do what you want..

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/collective/Products.LoginLockout/issues/6#issuecomment-251860548, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AACi5Ak_6SK5F_DbPip45DnqOD0_C4mgks5qxG9NgaJpZM4H77Eq .

[macagua]

For me is ok!

[puittenbroek]

Fine by me :)

[pysailor]

👍

[kcleong]

Fine by me :+1: