search

collective / collective.siteisolation

0 stars 1 forks source link

new release #5

Closed vangheem closed 9 years ago

vangheem commented 9 years ago

@mpeeters @gotcha @jfroche could you make a new release or give me rights to do so? This package requires a zcml slug still.

gotcha commented 9 years ago

Being explicit about zcml is important imo: http://bubblenet.be/blog/lets-get-rid-of-z3c.autoinclude

Rather than making a slug in buildout, add <include package="collective.siteisolation" /> in your Plone policy. IOW, I'd rather not make a new release.

vangheem commented 9 years ago

Pretty annoying for site integrators who just want to install an addon. I think you might be a bit overzealous about the explicit vs implicit.

I ask this because I was helping someone install this and it took him a long time to just install it. This was one of the problems.

gotcha commented 8 years ago

IMO, when trying to make Plone easier to approach, z3c.autoinclude went a step too far.

My main issue with z3c.autoinclude is that there is currently no way to avoid the problem it causes. Can we rethink how to avoid the need to declare packages both in egg and zcml section without causing the problems mentioned in my post ?