Open pgrunewald opened 7 months ago
@pgrunewald I added FZJ (nested) and DLR (flat) as well. Maybe @adrianschulz and Michi can add FHNW screenshots and @mbarde can add Uni Koblenz screenshots.
@pgrunewald @adrianschulz I'd propose going with "Faculty" and "Institute" for our two-level structure, what do you think?
Faculty:
Level 1:
Level 2:
Institute:
Variation A:
Variation B:
@pgrunewald @adrianschulz I'd propose going with "Faculty" and "Institute" for our two-level structure, what do you think?
I think a two-level structure should be sufficient to show-case the capability of the system to represent nested structures. Deeper levels (like working groups or professorships within institutes) dont require significant different features or layouts.
But maybe we should add examples for non-scientific facilities as well: Library, service units, central institutions, administration (?) ...
@pgrunewald I added FZJ (nested) and DLR (flat) as well. Maybe @adrianschulz and Michi can add FHNW screenshots and @mbarde can add Uni Koblenz screenshots.
Afaik we dont have any subsites. Right, @perret123 ?
Add subsites content types for schools (or "Fachbereiche") and Institutes. Institutes should be directly below Schools. This hierarchy my vary from university to unversity.
Preferably they are easily distinguishable by the navigation. See these examples:
TUD
School:
Faculty:
Institute:
JLU:
School:
Institute:
FZJ
Institut:
Institutsbereich:
DLR
Institute: