Closed toreyheinz closed 11 years ago
Hey @toreyheinz thanks for the PR!
The context is a success by default. So calling success!
really only adds to the context. I also find it strange that you could possibly mark a failed context as successful.
As a rule of thumb we have been writing Interactors in a way that they can stand alone and/or be moved within an organizer. Having a method like success!
to mirror fail!
seems as though it should also break the flow of the organizer.
I am going to mark this as closed, but we would welcome more discussion.
I like being able to call fail! and pass in my failure message, I would like to do the same with success!