rel_type vocabulary for RGs

[valevo]

background

• modeling the RGs as linked data will imply that the relationships between RGs, stored as e.g.

  "Trade":
    link: "niveau2/English/Trade_20240316.yml"
    rel_type: "narrower"

  , are turned into a relation between the RG itself and the RG that is with a predicate that expresses the rel_type -- because a linked data predicate has to be chosen (e.g. skos:narrower for the rel_type "narrower"), the vocabulary of rel_types needs to be fixed (and small)

currently used

• narrower (semantics similar to skos:narrower)
• broader (inverse of narrower; semantics similar to skos:broader)
• example (precise semantics unclear, something like "instance_of"? (would imply that inverse relation is "of_kind"))
• see also (expresses lack of precisely definable relationship type, used as a catch all)

MORE?

[valevo]

@wreints, please add new types here as you "invent" new ones, so we can inventorise

[wreints]

@valevo If you have any ideas on how to tackle this, please let us know. It's not my field of expertise and for us compliance with linked data standards is lower on the list of important things.

[valevo]

okay, then we'll actually leave it at these four types for now. I can't do this on my own because it's about conceptualising all the different RGs and relationships between them and that's something that only you fully understand/can anticipate. but I guess these four capture already a lot of pairs of RGs. please do flag it though when/if you find situations where these four relationships seem no longer apt or you feel like you'd need a new ones