Open Sander3003 opened 10 months ago
After playing around with MKDocs, I believe that we can better make use of Jekyll (or Hugo, suggested by Tamas). Both do the same.
Hugo is faster to generate HTML pages, but this is not really worth it, since we only have a few pages. Jekyll offers plugins where we can extend the usage
Jekyll: Pros: Widely used and allows plug-ins Cons: Slower build time
Hugo: Pro's: Fastest Con's: No plug-in
MKdocs: Pro's: Con's: No template generator
Todo: Upload the script to get the markdown files.
Tested here: https://openscd.github.io/Documentation/
Hypothesis; we believe that Jeckyll can publish all documentation at once on Github
Test; to verify that, we will make an Example Jeckyll
Metric; and measure if we can see all existing documentation in the current repositories
Criteria; we are right if: No documentation changes are needed Files are close to the code Easy to read Easy to navigate
Theme to use: https://jekyllthemes.io/theme/bulma
Acceptance criteria: Existing documentation Generate pages dynamically based on the MD files found in the repositories Convert https://com-pas.github.io/compas-architecture/ into the Bulma theme
Spike: 8 hours (excluding sharing) + 4 hours sharing Outcome: example setup with the plug-ins / session to discuss the results