Closed mr-c closed 7 years ago
@mr-c Is this valid as a workflow under the rules of salad-schema?
I had a similar issue #56 earlier and closed it due to a discussion that this is technically possible in cwltool but is actually considered not valid.
Yes, this is valid and reasonable (a benefit of the scoping rules)
Pe 3 apr. 2017 18:17, "Mark Robinson" notifications@github.com a scris:
@mr-c https://github.com/mr-c Is this valid as a workflow under the rules of salad-schema?
I had a similar issue #56 https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwlviewer/issues/56 earlier and closed it due to a discussion that this is technically possible in cwltool but is actually considered not valid https://github.com/common-workflow-language/schema_salad/issues/56.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwlviewer/issues/99#issuecomment-291175151, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABROCGk1LiD9lycmsHjHl_oAdgtn5mj4ks5rsQ2hgaJpZM4Mwhr1 .
@mr-c I would like some clarification on this issue. In the current version of schema salad
/cwltool
the following error is thrown due to the "index" ID being reused
object id `https://cdn.rawgit.com/roryk/salmon-cwl/9772782d041c4d0a180fc89d55c83c31b24bb6af/salmon-workflow.cwl#index` previously defined
Is this a bug in cwltool
or is this no longer considered valid?
Looks like the spec says "unique over the entire document", so an input
and an output
cannot share the same ID -- so I'll close this issue.
https://view.commonwl.org/workflows/github.com/roryk/salmon-cwl/tree/master///salmon-workflow.cwl
See
index
in the linked workflow