common-workflow-library / bio-cwl-tools

CWL CommandLineTool descriptions for biology/life-sciences related applications
https://github.com/common-workflow-library/bio-cwl-tools#readme
Apache License 2.0
76 stars 37 forks source link

Pull request template #103

Open pvanheus opened 4 years ago

pvanheus commented 4 years ago

What should go into a PR template for this repository? I'd like to propose the following:

And then as a stop-gap for testing, perhaps we can ask that the test in the tests/ folder be run by the contributor and the cwltool output of running the test is appended as a comment in the PR. I'm not sure exactly how to work this but more importantly, what do others think about this? It will at least ensure that contributed tools are working.

Then on the last check box proposed above, how does that relate to the public domain donations issue? And do / should tool contributors retain copyright to their tools?

Finally, what else is there to add to such a template?

cwl-bot commented 4 years ago

This issue has been mentioned on Common Workflow Language Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://cwl.discourse.group/t/moving-bio-cwl-tools-forward/213/2