Style of FMT_SMF ?

[bourdett]

I see three style for FMT_SMF / MOF across our PPs. Which one do we want to use?

Numbered List: (mdm pp) http://common-criteria.rhcloud.com/mdm/output/mdm-release.html#FMT_SMF.1.1(1)

List of Selections: (app pp) http://common-criteria.rhcloud.com/application/output/application.html#FMT_SMF.1.1

Numbered table with alternating line colors (this is for an fmt_mof, but we could adopt the style for fmt_smf) http://common-criteria.rhcloud.com/emailclient/output/emailclient-release.html#FMT_MOF_EXT.1.1

[jeffblank]

i suggest alternating line colors, with no numbering. so basically like the email client.

the numbers just force people to look at another document and make maintenance harder

On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:12 AM, bourdett notifications@github.com wrote:

I see three style for FMT_SMF / MOF across our PPs. Which one do we want to use?

Numbered List: (mdm pp)

http://common-criteria.rhcloud.com/mdm/output/mdm-release.html#FMT_SMF.1.1(1)

List of Selections: (app pp)

http://common-criteria.rhcloud.com/application/output/application.html#FMT_SMF.1.1

Numbered table with alternating line colors (this is for an fmt_mof, but we could adopt the style for fmt_smf)

http://common-criteria.rhcloud.com/emailclient/output/emailclient-release.html#FMT_MOF_EXT.1.1

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/commoncriteria/operatingsystem/issues/19.

[kgal]

Attempt 1 at fixing this:

    <management-function-set>
  <manager>Administrator</manager>
  <manager>User</manager>
         <!-- Requirement levied for both user and administrator  -->
  <management-function x="User,Administrator">aaaa</management-function>
         <!-- Requirement option for user -->
  <management-function o="User"> bbbb </management-function> 

creates a email PP- like table.