Closed jfisherbah closed 8 months ago
The ordering has been corrected but the table heading still says "implementation-based" while A.3 is "implementation-dependent" - the table heading should be changed for consistency.
They all should be 'implementation-based' now (I thought that that would be more similar to 'selection-based' as opposed to 'implementation-dependent' ).
I don't have an issue with that but you may want to confirm with NIAP since we've been using "implementation-dependent" for a while and documents have been written with that in mind. If this is changed there will be some author-inserted text in the XML that will need to be updated in each PP/module for consistency when the transforms are updated.
Everything has been changed to "Implementation-dependent" now. Ideally it could be changed to "Conditional," but whatevs.
The table in the "Consistency of Requirements" section of the consistency rationale (6.x.4) should ideally use the same terminology and ordering as the non-mandatory SFR appendices for the sake of consistency. Currently the non-mandatory sections in the table go:
Optional -> Selection-based -> Objective -> Implementation-based
For naming and ordering consistency this should instead be:
Strictly Optional -> Objective -> Implementation-dependent -> Selection-based