search

comp426-2022-fall / assignments

This repository contains information about and links to assignment invites and
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
0 stars 3 forks source link

Exam question: Partial Credit and Strange Autograder Errors? EDIT** #22

Closed bdhack23 closed 1 year ago

bdhack23 commented 1 year ago

Failed workflow run URL(most current one from when this issue was posted): https://github.com/comp426-2022-fall/e02comp-bdhack23/actions/runs/3644644748/jobs/6154084042

Question: Will there be partial credit for the final? It looks like I'm passing portions of parts, but my score does not go up. Or am I not reading the autograder correctly? In the screenshot, it looks like maybe I got one part of task 1 correct, but another part incorrect. But my score never seemed to improve from before when I had no parts correct. FIXED

Also, will there still be partial credit for stuff that did not pass the autograder? Like perhaps if we were close to passing the test but not completely correct?

Autograder is also giving me strange errors about unhandled error events in Task 1 and claiming that "math.add" in Task 2 is not a function. Task 3 autograder is also claiming I have no index.html file when I very clearly do.FIXED I'll add screenshots of the autograder:

task1 1 test2 0

Link to documentation:

math.js: https://mathjs.org/docs/getting_started.html Unhandled Error Event: https://peterthaleikis.com/posts/how-to-fix-throw-er-unhandled-error-event.html

What should be happening?: I feel like I should be getting partial credit but I am not, as the score never seems to go up with fixing parts of my code. FIXED

Autograder for Task 1 is also giving me strange errors about unhandled error events and Task 2 autograder claiming that "math.add" is not a function, as well as Task 3 autograder claiming that index.html doesn't exist when I can definitely see that it does.

Screenshots of your local test(s): N/A

Why do you think the autograder is failing? (BE SPECIFIC) Not sure, perhaps something is wrong with my computer or maybe my files are not very compatible with the autograder. Perhaps something in my package.json is making it where the autograder is having a difficult time understanding some of my code(I have had technical difficulties with it in the past, such as with the midterm.) I've looked at documentation, google, etc for hours and have made zero progress. Any advice is welcome. Here is a screenshot my package.json(without anything in "test"), if that helps:

packagejson
jdmar3 commented 1 year ago

So there is no real way for things that don't pass the check to be determined to be "almost passing" because they are all just testing whether the supplied inputs produce the expected outputs. For there to be partial credit, we would have to be hand evaluating 560+ directories full of code individually and I think that it should be relatively clear why that is not possible to do given that one instructor has 72 hours to turn compile and post grades for the course. It's not a thing.

With the math.js issue, the intent was not to have you use the math.js package, but to just write a script called math.js with an add function in it that gets exported using CommonJS methods. math.add() in the evaluation scripts refers to your math.js script, not any external package. That's what is in the README.

None of the errors you are getting are strange. They are just errors.

For the index.html errors, make sure that you are actually referencing the correct relative path and not either a 1) nonexistent path, or 2) an absolute path.