For current code, emitted and diluted particles have creation time equal to the current time. That is
aero_particle%least_create_time (aero_particle%greatest_create_time) is essentially equal to time = real(i_time, kind=dp) * run_part_opt%del_t in the run_part.F90.
On the other hand, the emitted (diluted) particles all go through one mosaic_timestep at the end of time loop. So would it be more natural to define creation time of particles to be time - del_t rather than time as it is right now? In other words, based on the current definition of creation time, particles created at some time go through one time step of mosaic but what happens after one time step of mosaic is also considered to happen at time, which seemed to be a bit weird.
For current code, emitted and diluted particles have creation time equal to the current time. That is
aero_particle%least_create_time (aero_particle%greatest_create_time)is essentially equal totime = real(i_time, kind=dp) * run_part_opt%del_tin therun_part.F90.On the other hand, the emitted (diluted) particles all go through one
mosaic_timestepat the end of time loop. So would it be more natural to define creation time of particles to betime - del_trather thantimeas it is right now? In other words, based on the current definition of creation time, particles created at sometimego through one time step of mosaic but what happens after one time step of mosaic is also considered to happen attime, which seemed to be a bit weird.