Submit the paper to a journal

[leouieda]

Information

• Journal name: Geophysical Journal International
• Journal guidelines for authors: https://academic.oup.com/gji/pages/General_Instructions
• Supplementary material DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.13604360

This is the standard EarthArXiv disclaimer for a preprint:

\noindent
\textbf{Disclaimer:}
This is a non-peer reviewed preprint submitted to EarthArXiv.
It is currently under review at \textit{insert-journal}.

Checklist

• [x] Reserve a DOI on figshare or Zenodo for the supplementary material (zip archive of this repository). Paste the DOI at the top of this issue.
• [x] Add the supplementary DOI to the manuscript
• [x] Make a cover letter for the editor. Include a short summary, suggested reviewers, and contributions by student authors
• [x] Submit the paper to the Journal
• [x] Submit the preprint to EarthArXiv
• [x] Add the preprint DOI to the README.md
• [x] Make a release on GitHub
• [x] Upload the .zip version of the repository to figshare or Zenodo and publish it
• [x] Add the preprint to the CompGeoLab (and your personal) website
• [x] Tell people about your preprint on social media (include a figure and maybe a thread with the main results)

[leouieda]

@santisoler I think we're pretty much good to go here. Is there anything we're waiting on to submit the paper? Would you like to do it or should I?

[santisoler]

I think we are ready now! I've already started a submission draft and I think uploading the PDF is the only item left. So let me finish that and then I'll continue with the checklist.

[leouieda]

@santisoler I'm thinking that we could archive the repository already now and update it after publication. The only issue is if the paper is rejected and we want to make this private again. But we'd still have the preprint there anyway so it wouldn't matter. What do you think?

[santisoler]

@santisoler I'm thinking that we could archive the repository already now and update it after publication. The only issue is if the paper is rejected and we want to make this private again. But we'd still have the preprint there anyway so it wouldn't matter. What do you think?

Since the preprint is already out, I wouldn't make this repo private again I think... so I'm ok for archiving the repo after #144 is merged.