Closed shanewstone closed 2 years ago
Notice that "Geophysical Research Letters" is abbreviated to "Geophys. ResearchLett." instead of "Geophys. Res. Lett."
Okay, this appears to be two issues:
The first one is going to take me a bit to figure out, the second one is just off an off by one issue that I'll have taken care of shortly. Would you mind opening another issue for the missing space?
I do not see any issues at all after 99363cb. Thanks!
Glad I could help, yeah - it ended up being easier than I expected. Turns out the first time I took a look at the space issue I didn't notice that I forgot a %
at the end of a line (see 06226f616e0218d751f3afbd4124f679073c6f90).
Hello and thank you for
jabbrv
. I have noticed the problem below when citing articles in "Geophysical Research Letters." I am using a fresh clone of thejabbrv
GitHub repository.Here is a minimal example using
jabbrv_unsrt.bst
as the bibliography style. Notice that "Geophysical Research Letters" is abbreviated to "Geophys. ResearchLett." instead of "Geophys. Res. Lett."The journal "Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets" is formatted correctly as "J. Geophys. Res. Planets"
If one replaces "Geophysical Research Letters" with "Geophysical Researches Letters" then the correct abbreviation is obtained ("Geophys. Res. Lett.").
Similar incorrect behavior is observed for, as an example, "Geophysical Review Letters" (abbreviated to "Geophys. ReviewLett.") but "Geophysical Reviews Letters" works correctly (abbreviated to "Geophys. Rev. Lett.").
I am not sure, but it looks like there may be extra space after "Geophys." in any of the three-word name cases (that is, in the abbreviations of Geophysical Research(es) Letters or Geophysical Review(s) Letters).