Closed tharun571 closed 3 months ago
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 75.08%. Comparing base (
ef0992a
) to head (7fd7b2c
). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"
@anutosh491 this PR covers #114 but there is a possible bug in CppInterOp. Do you want to close the issue with this simple test case or wait till that bug is resolved?
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"
clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! :+1:"
@alexander-penev, ping.
I am wondering why this did not increase code coverage.
I am wondering why this did not increase code coverage.
It said it has already been covered, but this is the only piece of code calling that function. And also it shows some code has not been covered even when it has been covered. Maybe codecov is not 100% accurate.
We seem to have that coverage here: https://github.com/compiler-research/xeus-cpp/blob/e4a86ec9c8b1da841b448179203e3d0727474f30/test/test_xcpp_kernel.py#L25
It is good to have it on the other place, too. This explains why we did not see coverage increase.
@alexander-penev review please.