Closed GeoHutch closed 5 years ago
Update from EECS ISG, looks like they want to keep the hpse computers on the list, and will submit a pull request when they are decomissioned (not just deprecated).
This is echoing what I said on email chain, but I want to hear thoughts on if it's worth setting up some information about what the hardware/software available hosts in the frontend here?
'Software available' seems very under-specified and potentially enormous (apt packages? Python packages? language interpreter versions?), but I imagine basic hardware stats might be more consistent, assuming a Linux system with /proc/cpuinfo
, /proc/meminfo
and lspci
.
This does sound like a lot of parsing work, however, and could quickly devolve into spaghetti stats without some disciplined approach.
The hpses, some c125-ms, (and presumably also these new ones) have cadence, vivado, modelsim, and some other proprietary tools on them which is what I was thinking of when I wrote that - short blurbs written by us like "Has software for: digital ICCAD, analog ICCAD"
That sounds good to me, I was thinking of at least mentioning number of CPUs, memory available, OS version, that kind of thing
Message also described the hpses as "deprecated". Should we de-list them?