Closed tomers closed 1 month ago
What's wrong with keeping the old name? I don't think we have to pretend it's not a direct continuation of this project.
EDIT: On the other hand, other projects did change name for similar reasons. Such as yt-dlp. How about dymoprint+?
We'd like this project to be able to expand to non-Dymo printers.
I think LabelGenious
is misspelled and should be LabelGenius
. That aside I personally have fairly negative connotations around the word "genius".
Not sure if it's much better, but maybe simplelabel or labelsimple?
Also, we the name may come out better if we don't include the words "label" or "print". For example we could choose the name of some random obscure animal.
I'd also like to get feedback here from @computerlyrik, @MooVx, @putzio, @aleksas, @systeemkabouter, @claui.
To pick a name, we could do it the old Unix way. Let's settle on a descriptive acronym, such as: Free Label Printer Software.
Then:
cat /usr/share/dict/* | grep ^f.*l.*p.*s | awk '{ print length, $0 }' | sort -n | cut -d" " -f2- | uniq
There you go, Flopsy. :)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Flopsy is a common name for pet rabbits.
As close as it gets to a random animal. ;)
I really love both the name and the method @tomek-szczesny! I'm so disappointed that it's already taken by this project.
The method was in use as early as in Samba (SMB) days. :) Norally I'd argue it's not a trademark, but I agree the new name should be at least available in pip.
Any other acronyms we could try?
^la.*pr
gives lamprey. It's available, but lampreys are pretty ugly.
Open source label printer → oversleep. I'm not so convinced.
Maybe something like libreprint?
libreprint sounds good. I checked and it was not taken, besides some obsolete GH project, nrc/libreprint https://github.com/nrc/libreprint, which is 10 y.o. The name corresponds with other open source projects, such as libreoffice.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 12:09 AM Ben Mares @.***> wrote:
^la.*pr gives lamprey. It's available, but lampreys are pretty ugly.
Open source label printer → oversleep. I'm not so convinced.
Maybe something like libreprint?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/computerlyrik/dymoprint/issues/114#issuecomment-1974922040, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAUL42OE7DEAXXLYALOOILYWJE2DAVCNFSM6AAAAABEAI2SXOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZUHEZDEMBUGA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I don't like libreprint, because it implies a much broader spectrum of uses than just label printing. Looks like a name for re-implementation of CUPS.
Revisiting my best idea so far, flopsie appears to be available.
I tried ^[lfo].*l.*p.*[s]
for Libre/Free/Open Label Printer Software/Suite and can't see any better candidates at the moment.
I don't intend to take part in making the final decision, it's just my contribution to the topic. :)
Hi,
Just my 2c, Libre Label covers the purpose and has the nice alliterating quality to it. Libre Tag also seems a good option
Met vriendelijke groet,
Eelco Maljaars
Infrastructuur ontwikkelaar / security specialist
T +31 (0)6 34 44 53 62 E @.*** I www.lutra-it.eu
On 3 Mar 2024, at 11:03, Tomek Szczęsny @.***> wrote:
I don't like libreprint, because it implies a much broader spectrum of uses than just label printing. Looks like a name for re-implementation of CUPS.
Revisiting my best idea so far, flopsie appears to be available. I tried ^[lfo].l.p.*[s] for Libre/Free/Open Label Printer Software/Suite and can't see any better candidates at the moment.
I don't intend to take part in making the final decision, it's just my contribution to the topic. :)
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/computerlyrik/dymoprint/issues/114#issuecomment-1975108726, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIVFJ4ZSN4YKTDPSO3HHOLYWLYPNAVCNFSM6AAAAABEAI2SXOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZVGEYDQNZSGY. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Thanks for keeping the ideas flowing!
I agree that LibreLabel is better than LibrePrint.
My main concern with "flopsie" is confusion with "flopsy". It'll be really easy for someone to mistype or misremember and end up with the wrong package.
I also agree that LibreLabel is better than LibrePrint. Ben, can we conclude this, and commit to this name?
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 12:31 PM Ben Mares @.***> wrote:
Thanks for keeping the ideas flowing!
I agree that LibreLabel is better than LibrePrint.
My main concern with "flopsie" is confusion with "flopsy". It'll be really easy for someone to mistype or misremember and end up with the wrong package.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/computerlyrik/dymoprint/issues/114#issuecomment-1975115348, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAUL4ZWXOKWB7U3AA42FDLYWL3XDAVCNFSM6AAAAABEAI2SXOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZVGEYTKMZUHA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I'd be fine with LibreLabel, but I think we might as well keep the discussion open until tomorrow. People who don't check GitHub over the weekend may have something to contribute. Besides, we're not yet ready to cut a release since master
and tomer_fixes
are broken. (See https://github.com/tomers/dymoprint/pull/6 for a potential fix.)
Thanks @aleksas for two suggestions via email!
TagTailor, Taggle
I like Taggle and it's available on PyPI, but unfortunately it seems to be already in use a lot of companies. For example, when I search from France it comes up as the name of a French board game. I'd prefer to aim for something distinctive.
TagTailor seems a reasonable competitor to LibreLabel. (My personal feeling is that LibreLabel is more descriptive.)
Another suggestion, albeit not entirely distinctive, would be Labelle.
It’s a portmanteau of the words label and belle. Also a pseudo-homonym of the French la belle. Besides, it’s closely related to the German name for a (not-so-obscure) animal, the Libelle (dragonfly).
Labelle sounds great to me! It is also available in both pip and Github. It is also a funk rock band: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labelle
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 5:05 PM Claudia Pellegrino @.***> wrote:
Another suggestion, albeit not entirely distinctive, would be Labelle.
It’s a portmanteau of the words label and belle. Also a pseudo-homonym of the French la belle. Besides, it’s closely related to the German name for a (not-so-obscure) animal, the Libelle https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libellen (dragonfly).
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/computerlyrik/dymoprint/issues/114#issuecomment-1978982019, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAUL4YREWLKXFUSK67XVM3YWXNJ7AVCNFSM6AAAAABEAI2SXOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNZYHE4DEMBRHE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
We got some great suggestions already. I wish I had this kind of support when I named my projects. :)
How do we choose one now? I think we can safely rule out LibrePrint, Flopsy/Flopsie, and Taggle.
If I'm not mistaken, we accumulated so far: LibreLabel, LibreTag, TagTailor, Labelle. I like Labelle the most, because it's just two syllables.
Brilliant suggestion @claui! I also like Labelle the most of all the suggestions so far.
Unfortunately when I check it seems that the GitHub organization is already taken: https://github.com/labelle That's an annoyance, but I think we can work around it. For example, we could make an organization called labelle-devs.
Just checked there are no packages in Arch, Manjaro or AUR named labelle.
For example, we could make an organization called labelle-devs.
Won't that be confusing though?
Won't that be confusing though?
I don't think so. I'm more concerned about users pip install
-ing the wrong package. I'm fairly confident that GitHub contributors will be able to locate our repository, e.g. via Google rather than through the organization name. Most projects don't have an organization that matches the project title. Besides, we can have PyPI link back to the correct repository.
These might need just a tiny bit of work /s, but here's some inspiration for a possible logo :joy:
We could ask the owner whether they might be willing to donate the org name to us, given that theirs appears abandoned.
@jdickan Excuse the intrusion, but are you still using your GitHub organization github.com/labelle? If not, would you consider donating it to this project?
I think he has to be contacted via linkedin, that github account also appears abandoned.
Won't that be confusing though?
I don’t think it’s that confusing. I figure people mostly click on search results or other existing links rather than synthesize a URL by hand.
So it seems we all agree on the name labelle
for the project.
Since https://github.com/labelle is taken, then what would you suggest the
organization name will be? Maybe https://github.com/labelle-org ?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 2:44 PM Claudia Pellegrino @.***> wrote:
Won't that be confusing though?
I don’t think it’s that confusing. I figure people mostly click on search results or other existing links rather than synthesize a URL by hand.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/computerlyrik/dymoprint/issues/114#issuecomment-2009480953, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAUL47BRYOKPA6YXM4TIVTYZGABXAVCNFSM6AAAAABEAI2SXOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMBZGQ4DAOJVGM . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
labelle-org is fine, so would be labelle-devs, labelle-hq..
Labelle v1.0.0 has been released on PyPI and is equivalent to Dymoprint v2.4.0.
https://github.com/labelle-org/labelle
Labelle v1.1.0 will be released soon, and it will be equivalent to the current master
.
Great achievement, Ben!
Thanks a lot for your efforts. Once we're done with the migration, and after we'll merge my current work (I'll send a review soon enough), I think we should start publishing this "new" project in various channels. We should strive to increase our user base, and encourage developers to assist us.
Regards, Tomer
On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 12:25 AM Ben Mares @.***> wrote:
Labelle v1.0.0 has been released on PyPI and is equivalent to Dymoprint v2.4.0.
https://github.com/labelle-org/labelle
image.png (view on web) https://github.com/computerlyrik/dymoprint/assets/15216687/05b893ba-b7d4-47b6-95c3-2a2ed869c839
Labelle v1.1.0 will be released soon, and it will be equivalent to the current master.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/computerlyrik/dymoprint/issues/114#issuecomment-2053764989, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAUL42TCM5GK6YLMO6EVPTY5GPDVAVCNFSM6AAAAABEAI2SXOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDANJTG43DIOJYHE . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
We did it, Labelle v1.1.0 is out!!! Many thanks to @tomers for rewriting a huge portion of the code!
Please give it a try and make sure I didn't mess anything up with the migration. Once we confirm that it's working well, we'll finish by deprecating Dymoprint.
For those determining which version of Dymoprint or Labelle to choose:
The CLI entrypoints have been updated as:
dymoprint
→ labelle
dymoprint_gui
→ labelle-gui
If you have installed Dymoprint with pipx
, you can uninstall it with
pipx uninstall dymoprint
To install a particular version of Dymoprint or Labelle,
pipx install "labelle<2" # Install the latest v1.x version of Labelle
# NOTE: The quotes are required because otherwise `<` is interpreted as a redirect.
As discussed in PR #113, we plan to fork this project in a new Github organization. This issue is for discussing and managing related logistics.
Name
Reasonable names are hard to find, as they are mostly already taken by other companies and products. I consulted OpenAI, and came up with the name 'LabelGenious'. @maresb, @tomek-szczesny please approve.