Partially built on top of @jeswr's WIP PR from #161.
@jitsedesmet I changed the ordering logic quite a bit (the old version had a fundamental flaw where > was considered the opposite to <), so it might be good for you to check if I didn't break anything major (all unit and spec tests still pass).
coverage: 100.0%. remained the same when pulling 04af32204e22c6b6ceeb67456646afbc01f0e1d6 on feature/rdf-star into 1d9ca76f0355303661822b691257e3c17f8892aa on master.
Partially built on top of @jeswr's WIP PR from #161.
@jitsedesmet I changed the ordering logic quite a bit (the old version had a fundamental flaw where
>
was considered the opposite to<
), so it might be good for you to check if I didn't break anything major (all unit and spec tests still pass).