Closed jitsedesmet closed 3 years ago
Totals | |
---|---|
Change from base Build 1100387159: | 0.0% |
Covered Lines: | 1261 |
Relevant Lines: | 1398 |
I could just re-enable the test disabled in #40 so this PR should close that issue.
I guess a template would be pretty cool. Personally I like the current syntax because it provides a nice description on the function. A template is a bit harder for arity: 'vary'
but that one is a bit of a weird one anyway :/ . Anyway, I personalty like the description syntax we have now a bit more.
I guess a template would be pretty cool. Personally I like the current syntax because it provides a nice description on the function. A template is a bit harder for
arity: 'vary'
but that one is a bit of a weird one anyway :/ . Anyway, I personalty like the description syntax we have now a bit more.
It's true, it showcases clearly which properties of the function are relevant for the logic behind it. Let's keep it without templates.
This pull request aims to clean the test suit and provides a little more explanation on how tests work and how you can write new ones.