octo-logger-cpp: update checksum for 1.12.0

toge commented 4 days ago

Summary

Changes to recipe: octo-logger-cpp/1.12.0

Motivation

tar ball of 1.12.0 is updated.

Details

[x] Read the contributing guidelines
[x] Checked that this PR is not a duplicate: list of PRs by recipe
[x] Tested locally with at least one configuration using a recent version of Conan

conan-center-bot commented 4 days ago

Conan v1 pipeline :heavy_check_mark:

All green in build 1 (718287b98e9dffbe7604120f7111c9d5a2a6a405):

octo-logger-cpp/1.12.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.5.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.9.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.4.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.6.1: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.2.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.11.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.1.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)

Conan v2 pipeline :heavy_check_mark:

Note: Conan v2 builds are now mandatory. Please read our discussion about it.

All green in build 1 (718287b98e9dffbe7604120f7111c9d5a2a6a405):

octo-logger-cpp/1.12.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.11.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.2.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.9.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.6.1: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.5.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.4.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)
octo-logger-cpp/1.1.0: All packages built successfully! (All logs)

jcar87 commented 4 days ago

Please note that it 1.12.0 does not appear to be a release yet: https://github.com/ofiriluz/octo-logger-cpp/releases

so maybe the maintainers are updating the tag until it is.

furthermore, this is the second time we have a checksum issue: https://github.com/conan-io/conan-center-index/pull/24308

I can see that this will continue being a problem until 1.12.0 is actually released. Under what conditions was 1.12.0 considered a release? The presence of the tag?

toge commented 4 days ago

@jcar87 @RubenRBS Thank you for your deep dive.

I have updated this recipe as the 1.12.0 tag has been added. I understand that this is an inconvenient situation for cci. I will keep the use of 1.12.0 in my private environment. Is there any way to make this clear to users that it will be difficult to use 1.12.0 on cci until an official release is made?

jcar87 commented 3 days ago

Is there any way to make this clear to users that it will be difficult to use 1.12.0 on cci until an official release is made?

Thanks @toge ! We can probably invalidate all packages in the validate() method and point users to use an older version? Until a new recipe revision is published that has the actual release. Or we can publish these as 1.12.0-pre1 etc - but point to the actual commit rather than the 1.12.0 tag - but the 1.12.0 will still remain published

Any ideas @RubenRBS ??

conan-io / conan-center-index