Open roalz opened 7 years ago
why would you want fastlz if there is lz4? I guess you are going for fast speed, with okay ratios. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37614410/comparison-between-lz4-vs-lz4-hc-vs-blosc-vs-snappy-vs-fastlz
If that is true: I'd vote for lz4 instead of FastLZ for this issue. https://github.com/lz4/lz4 It's a C lib without dependencies. The conanfile could be written in a manner of minutes probably
I don't see FastLZ referenced in the links you provided. Anyway, I would personally prefer to use lz4, but I'm working on a project that uses FastLZ, thus I'd like to have it listed in Conan.
http://fastlz.org/