Sorry if this issue has already been opened or if the documentation already answers this question.
I looked for it on the Internet and throughout the README but I couldn't find anything relevant to my problem.
I want to know if there's a way to do something like, for instance, this:
to be able to define bindings for multiple keymaps at once.
I think this should also affects :bind*, :bind-keymap and :bind-keymap*.
There is a passage in the documentation which I struggle to understand about using [remap isearch-forward] as a vector, but from my understanding, it doesn't address this issue.
I'm not sure already about the macro-expand-1 form that would be expected from this, but with a little help I'm willing to propose an implementation for this feature if there's no better way and if there's nothing against this.
Thanks for suggesting this feature.
Your grammar is fine. However, the parsing part of the argument :bind is difficult, so it may be challenging to create a PR, but I am positive about this suggestion.
Hello,
Sorry if this issue has already been opened or if the documentation already answers this question. I looked for it on the Internet and throughout the README but I couldn't find anything relevant to my problem.
I want to know if there's a way to do something like, for instance, this:
to be able to define bindings for multiple keymaps at once.
I think this should also affects
:bind*
,:bind-keymap
and:bind-keymap*
.There is a passage in the documentation which I struggle to understand about using
[remap isearch-forward]
as a vector, but from my understanding, it doesn't address this issue.I'm not sure already about the
macro-expand-1
form that would be expected from this, but with a little help I'm willing to propose an implementation for this feature if there's no better way and if there's nothing against this.