codecov[bot]
commented
1 month ago Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 83.33333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 85.71%. Comparing base (
b80596b) to head (192d496). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| ...ndard-error/standard-error-adornment-component.tsx | 0.00% | 1 Missing :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1384 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 85.63% 85.71% +0.08% ========================================== Files 524 524 Lines 25690 25690 Branches 6560 7001 +441 ========================================== + Hits 22000 22021 +21 + Misses 3535 3391 -144 - Partials 155 278 +123 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/concord-consortium/codap/pull/1384/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=concord-consortium) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [cypress](https://app.codecov.io/gh/concord-consortium/codap/pull/1384/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=concord-consortium) | `72.67% <83.33%> (+0.09%)` | :arrow_up: | | [jest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/concord-consortium/codap/pull/1384/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=concord-consortium) | `53.42% <0.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=concord-consortium#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
cypress[bot]
The TypeScript 5.6 beta release notes describes an upcoming feature of TypeScript patterned after a recently added ESLint rule that catches a surprising number of bugs. This PR enables the new lint rule and fixes the code that was found by it. All instances in the v3 code related to confusion around precedence of the
??operator, which requires additional parentheses to fix.