codecov[bot]
commented
1 month ago Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 53.74%. Comparing base (
c86ce9d) to head (e753e43). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
| Files | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| v3/src/components/tool-shelf/tool-shelf.tsx | 40.00% | 3 Missing :warning: |
:exclamation: There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (c86ce9d) and HEAD (e753e43). Click for more details.
HEAD has 5 uploads less than BASE
| Flag | BASE (c86ce9d) | HEAD (e753e43) | |------|------|------| |cypress|5|0|
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1390 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 85.71% 53.74% -31.98% =========================================== Files 526 520 -6 Lines 25837 25788 -49 Branches 7000 7049 +49 =========================================== - Hits 22147 13859 -8288 - Misses 3409 11773 +8364 + Partials 281 156 -125 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/concord-consortium/codap/pull/1390/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=concord-consortium) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [cypress](https://app.codecov.io/gh/concord-consortium/codap/pull/1390/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=concord-consortium) | `?` | | | [jest](https://app.codecov.io/gh/concord-consortium/codap/pull/1390/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=concord-consortium) | `53.74% <40.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=concord-consortium#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
cypress[bot]
Moving the undo/redo strings into the component registration allows us to eliminate component-specific code in the
ToolShelfcomponent.Note: This PR is rooted on #1389, which should be merged first.