Given the name of this branch I misunderstood what this work was about. The main point of this interactive is not to compare dipole-dipole to London dispersion but to compare the potential energy generated by breaking intermolecular attractions (attractions between molecules) with the potential energy generated by breaking chemical bonds. Don't change the name of the branch now, but generally we try to make the branch names short but somewhat meaningful. Just a suggestion for next time. I'll review and provide some feedback in the appropriate places.
Given the name of this branch I misunderstood what this work was about. The main point of this interactive is not to compare dipole-dipole to London dispersion but to compare the potential energy generated by breaking intermolecular attractions (attractions between molecules) with the potential energy generated by breaking chemical bonds. Don't change the name of the branch now, but generally we try to make the branch names short but somewhat meaningful. Just a suggestion for next time. I'll review and provide some feedback in the appropriate places.